Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 261 - 280 of 132,697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Strzepek v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 02962 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Strzepek v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 02962 Decided on May 30, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Vineesha Sow
Two cases were filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, State of Texas v. [read post]
In doing so, the Court held that insurers with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims are “parties in interest” under the United States Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, may appear and be heard, including to object to Chapter 11 reorganization plans. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
  Clarify that an employment contract may only be transferred to one employer and may not be split between multiple transferee employers. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:30 am by David Ashmore and Jonathan Lord
While most in England are debating whether it should be Ivan Toney or Ollie Watkins as first-choice deputy for Harry Kane, in the employment law world we have been focusing on the strikers at the heart of an important new Supreme Court decision in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:10 pm by lennyesq
  Indeed, the May 6 Letter objects specifically to the “ideological homogeneity” it attributes to Columbia’s faculty and administration and insists that the boycott will continue until there is “[v]iewpoint diversity on the faculty and across the administration—including the admissions office. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
Department of State's official notice.For further guidance and to understand how this may affect your specific situation, consulting with a legal expert is advised. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
Krunchcash, LLC (May 30, 2024), in which the lower court determined that Lawyer A was required to notify Lawyer B that the link contained folders that "counsel knew or should have known were confidential or privileged. [read post]