Search for: "State v. Makee R." Results 261 - 280 of 34,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However, they rejected the appellant’s submission that this conclusion follows from the wording of POCA 2002, because of the principle enunciated in R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51 that property obtained as a result of or in connection with crime remains the defendant’s benefit whether or not he retains it. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:47 am by tracey
Regina (Garland) v Secretary of State for Justice and another: [2011] EWCA Civ 1335;  [2011] WLR (D)  333 “Under rule 53(1) of the Prison Rules 1999 prison authorities were allowed a full 48 hours from discovery of an offence against discipline to lay a charge against a prisoner, and longer where there were exceptional circumstances making it impossible to lay the charge within that time.” WLR Daily, 17th November 2011 Source:… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In the very recent case of Yankey v Austin (2020) LPELR-49540(CA)  the Nigerian Court of Appeal was faced with the issue of whether a court in the United State has jurisdiction to make an order affecting immovable property in Lagos, Nigeria. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(on the application of Sayed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R(on the application of Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that Article 8 of the Convention need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant an applicant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:05 am
The UCCJEA makes it clear that in order for a Court of this state to have decision making power regarding custody of a child, a court of another state cannot have decision making power over that child. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am by SW
The much-anticipated decision in R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin) has arrived, confirming that in an emergency, “Everyone In” really does mean everyone. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
State of Utah v Gomez concerns a search and seizure case where the defendant was found guilty of possessing a variety of illegal drugs. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
There's this little thing you may well have studied in law school that's spelled S-O-V-E-R-E-I-G-N I-M-M-U-N-I-T-Y. [read post]