Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 261 - 280 of 4,653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am by Julie L. Spieker
The judge stated, “The prejudicial nature of this testimony accusing MGA of racist cultural appropriation cannot be understated. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
 State equality in the Senate constrains persons who believe in representation by population, configures politics by enabling low population states to receive far more than their fair share of federal funds, and constitutes politics when people assume that equal state representation is a natural feature of governance in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am by Dan Lopez
We’re going to cross the pond and we’re going to get a report on some interesting issues and recent cases that have been adjudicated over in the United Kingdom and a view from our friends in the UK regarding the state of competition law on some important topics that my partner, Stephen Critchley, will introduce. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
One of the candidates for "Antitrust Trial of the Year 2023" is the upcoming United States et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Jim Dempsey
They were bolstered in that position by the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]