Search for: "State v. Marker"
Results 261 - 280
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
Unlike normative markers, the reduction of democratic ideology to a set of indicators also makes it possible to fine tune the process of identifying and correcting defects, of monitoring, and of disciplining deviance among states. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
This support of Washington v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
See Hefley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am
This made stopping out-of-state violators working in New Jersey particularly difficult, as they often left the state before the department could enforce state regulations. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
Alternatively, as others have suggested he may be playing the long game, sacrificing a chance to strike down the health care law in order to set new markers on issues including the commerce clause and the spending power. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
He also noted other cases involving different-sex couples where courts bound non-biological parents to support obligations, including a recent ruling by the state's highest court, Shondel J. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
United States (Nov. 3) Attorney Lori Windham, Fulton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 10:16 am
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
How about if he used marker pens to color her teeth like a rainbow? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Reddy's Laboratories v Eli Lilly [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 where the judge, having reviewed the EPO jurisprudence on obviousness including Agrevo T 0939/92 stated: "The EPO jurisprudence is founded firmly around a fundamental question: has a patentee made a novel non-obvious technical advance and provided sufficient justification for it to be credible? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Both policies at issue in DNC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:50 am
” The Coleman decision laid down a marker for the courts of appeal around the state that the plain meaning of the statutory language must be enforced regardless of the impact on seemingly legitimate lawsuits or the original intent of the statute’s drafters. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
California and United States v. [read post]
