Search for: "State v. Maxwell"
Results 261 - 280
of 480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 10:58 am
Maxwell: It is a regrettable reality that some federal judges like to second-guess state courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
Maxwell. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:24 am
Maxwell (10-1548). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
When Maxwell filed a state habeas petition, the California Supreme Court sent the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:29 am
Id. at 1017; Papakosmas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
London : Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, 2010 ccxxx, 1224 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (apparently relisted eight times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:19 am
As The Court stated; "Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendants were under no obligation to plead, as an affirmative defense, the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory notice of claim requirement (see Laroc v City of New York, 46 AD3d 760, 761; Maxwell v City of New York, 29 AD3d 540, 541; Lynch v New York City Tr. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:59 am
Maxwell are still missing in action, but I wouldn't be surprised to see summary reversals in those two in January.In a somewhat crime-related case, the Supreme Court took up the controversial Arizona immigration law in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (seven times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Maxwell, 10-1548 (relisted six times); and Wetzel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:13 am
United States, No. 11-5683 and Hill v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
The second is the appointment of a brand new team member, to cover developments in the United States -- the highly respected (despite the fact that he's a friend of the IPKat) Professor David C. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Maxwell, 10-1548 (Ninth Circuit, fifth relist), and Hardy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:44 am
Maxwell . [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (Ninth Circuit, fourth relist), and Hardy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:26 pm
Maxwell, 341 F. [read post]
