Search for: "State v. McKinney"
Results 261 - 280
of 447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
McKinney School of Law, Controlling Health Care Spending: More Patient 'Skin in the Game? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
Looking to next term, the Supreme Court has docketed a few cases that will have some effect on death penalty litigation, including McKinney v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:22 pm
In a notable Tennessee opinion, Timothy Terell McKinney v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
The OCME uploaded the 15 loci profile of the major male contributor to the New York State DNA Index System [`SDIS’], which resulted in a match to the defendant's `Convicted Offender’ profile.People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:01 am
McKinney, 287 N.J. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
,McKinney v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Nathan McKinney v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:25 am
Johnson, states: “in the month since Ms. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
Though perhaps illogical, the verdicts may stand ( see, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 12:01 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
Plaintiffs received a promissory note stating that the $100,000 would be applied to the purchase price upon closing. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
McKinney Hosp. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
McKinney Hosp. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
McKinney School of Law. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
McKinney School of Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3025:3 at 87, citing Mendoza v Mendoza, 4 Misc 2d 1060, 1061 [Sup Ct, NY County 1947], affd 273 App Div 877 [1st Dept 1948]). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]
