Search for: "State v. Mellons"
Results 261 - 277
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2008, 4:35 am
And the recent Carnegie-Mellon patent was invalidated on the same basis.This comment evokes Charlie Gibson lecturing Sarah Palin on his view of the Bush doctrine.This author has written on Rochester v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
" And so it is with Carnegie Mellon University and Three Rivers Biologicals v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:36 am
In Burns Estate v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:02 am
Simon Tanner, Reproduction Charging Models & Rights Policy for Digital Images in American Art Museums (a Mellon Foundation study) This was part of the background materials for the Corel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:27 pm
Related Web Resources: Shammami v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:59 am
"
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
Welshonce Julie McGuire graduated first in her class from Carnegie Mellon University (B.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:41 am
The USPTO has identified common uses as including the ability to "[v]iew bibliographic data, status, file history, PDF file images ("IFW"), continuity, foreign priority, patent term adjustments & extensions, text & TIFF images of published applications & patents, maintenance fees, and online ordering of copies. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
One-Year Limit Period to Challenge Sentence Not Tolled Pending Application for Counsel
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:23 pm
v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
Mellon, 262 U.S. 447, 487 (1923).Frothingham was a taxpayer challenge to the Maternity Act, which gave federal money to the states to improve maternal and infant mortality. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
That policy goes all the way back to Frothingham v Mellon in 1923. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Mellon. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Kahle v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
" (Abstract ID: 1143578) This Article considers the constitutional status of state punitive damage judgments and the particular obligation that sister-states have to enforce them. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 6:36 am
Kolari v. [read post]
