Search for: "State v. Morrison" Results 261 - 280 of 1,783
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 5:14 am by Dennis Crouch
  “It is a long-standing principle of American law that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” Morrison v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:02 pm
Articles explore the current state of AI, Innovation in practice, Outside Counsel Guidelines,  Sustainable KM, CRM Data Quality and  New Career Paths  for information professionals. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:48 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  Case 2: a foreign investor who purchases securities of a foreign issuer on a foreign exchange is harmed by fraud some component of which takes place within the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm by Heidi Meinzer
Great news for employees and volunteers of rescues and shelters — thanks to the recent case of Van Dusen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:24 pm by Lyle Roberts
In Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming in an unpublished opinion.Years later, the state Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:07 am by Laura Sandwell
David T Morrison and Co Limited t/a Gael Home Interiors v ICL Plastics Limited & Ors is listed for two days from this morning. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by Anna Christensen
United States and Bloate v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
Trials The most high profile data protection case of the year was Various Claimants v Wm Morrisons [2017]  EWHC 3113 (QB)(Langstaff J). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm by James Hamilton
The comments were submitted at the SEC’s invitation as the Commission prepares a report mandated by Section 929Y of Dodd-Frank to address whether the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:08 am by Guest Blogger
Morrison Much has been written about two recent decisions, one striking down the section of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that denies federal benefits to same sex couples, who are legally married under the laws of their state, that are available to opposite sex married couples (Gill v. [read post]