Search for: "State v. N. L." Results 261 - 280 of 5,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
A&L countered that the Sixth Circuit should adopt the Fifth Circuit’s recently formulated approach in Swales v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Bill Marler
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
Bush Administration OIRA head Susan Dudley and former EPA policy official Brian Mannix write that, “[i]n principle, a benefit-cost analysis should be ‘complete. [read post]