Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co."
Results 261 - 280
of 770
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Howey Co., which states that a security is an investment contract in which a person 1) invests their money; 2) in a common enterprise; 3) with an expectation of profits; 4) based on the efforts of the promoter or a third party. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
In doing so the BGH rather restrictively applies the CJEU reasoning in its recent decision in Nintendo Co Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH (C-25/16) of 27 September 2017 [here], which was handed down in the context of registered community designs to trade marks. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
(relisted after the November 3 conference) Returning Relists National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
Board-Tech Electronic Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Chuang v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
America’s Favorite Chicken Co. dba Church’s Chicken). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 2:30 pm
Cable National Broadcasting Co., 86 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 1996) in support of its proposition that in order to plead a “reverse confusion” theory, “a plaintiff must allege that the defendant `saturated the market with advertising’ or alleged actual reverse confusion from customers. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:07 pm
Likewise, in NAACP v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
See my article on keyword ads and lawyers. * Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
Mike Hager is co-hosting a fundraiser for North Carolina Lt. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Universal Amusement Co. (1980)). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
This ruling is hardly a surprise and is consistent with the Court’s recent decisions in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Norwich supplies a principled rationale for granting injunctions against non-parties who facilitate wrongdoing (see Cartier, at paras. 51-55; and Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
