Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 5:12 am
Verrett v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:49 am
’Officer Ortiz handcuffed Lara, and he and Officer Fix searched Lara's house and car for the gun. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
In Kaufman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
He suggested that Clapper v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
These figures should perhaps be taken with a grain of salt given the regular rotation of units and the possibility that the numbers undercount special forces and other personnel who deploy for only short periods of time. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:09 am
United States, 690 F.2d 966 (D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
Office of Personnel Management (Circuit dockets 12-15388 and 12-15409), is here. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
United States, No. 1:17-cv-2487 (KBJ) (D.D.C. 2019) (memorandum opinion) Guam v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Governor Brown vetoed a similar measure last year and stated it “plainly violates federal law. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:26 pm
Jones v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
” The case is Enriquez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
” The case is Enriquez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
By the end of the argument, the consensus of the justices seemed clear: Congress would have to legislate much more clearly than it has so far before the justices would force private litigants to pay the costs of the government’s in-house legal personnel. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:09 am
House of Representatives, when the House both moved to dismiss the DOMA case Pedersen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm
Only 29 Senators and 186 Members of the House of Representatives brought the case. [read post]
