Search for: "State v. R. S."
Results 261 - 280
of 71,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
Authored by Francesca Cassidy-Taylor On Friday 23 April, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in R v Umerji [2021] EWCA Crim 598. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Rucho v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 5:27 am
O'Neill in 1996, holding that de facto segregation violated the state's education clause. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:22 am
The US Supreme Court handed down this morning an important case about the relationship between federal prohibitions and state laws in Murphy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:04 pm
(Wheeling), R & V Associates Ltd. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Senator Sam Thompson (R-12) issued the following statement in response to the ruling issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of DePascale v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:19 pm
” In Mozes v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:06 am
Federalevidence blog notes the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:03 am
Thunder Lake on the Red Lake Reservation Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 71, no. 3, 2011) is out. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Arguing before the Supreme Court, watching United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 5:00 am
Recently I listened to the 9th Circuit's en banc oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
R. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:58 am
R (on the application of Bancoult) Respondent v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 61 (22 October 2008) Helow (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Respondents) (Scotland) [2008] UKHL 62 (22 October 2008) R (on the application of RJM) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 63 (22 October 2008) EM… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:12 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khanani, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 276 (28 January 2009) Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v M [2009] EWCA Crim 214 (21 January 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AM (Somalia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 114 (25 February 2009) S & Ors, R [...] [read post]
