Search for: "State v. Rea" Results 261 - 280 of 1,210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Mark Lahn
Despite lacking the mens rea to commit their offences, both individuals were found guilty. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, in which the court faced the question whether the First Amendment requires a minimum showing of mens rea, or criminal intent. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
A United States Secret Service Special Agent with training in identifying counterfeit currency opined that the inkjet printer, linen paper, and acetone were items used in the manufacturing of counterfeit currency. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:26 am by Giles Peaker
Also worth noting what looks like an interesting Judicial Review decision in the joined cases of R (Mohamed) v Waltham Forest LBC, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) intervening and R (Mohamed) v Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court, Waltham Forest LBC et al, Secretary of State for HCLG intervening (2020) EWHC 1083 (Admin). [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:17 am by Matt Ramsey
By Michael Snyder and Laura Lipschutz On Thursday, April 23, 2020, in the case Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:43 am by Ronald Mann
In a term with blockbuster decisions hovering on the horizon about disclosure of presidential records, abortion, workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and protections for Dreamers, Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]