Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 261 - 280
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
In a 1980 case called City of Rome, the court essentially held the same thing. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:33 am
Part V: Cultural Property. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 5:57 am
If the real risk test, as applied in El Haski v. [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 2:58 pm
Prosecutor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
By way of example, the elements of the crime of rape as a violation of international law weren’t defined until the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s (ICTR) 1998 Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
During its upcoming term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:02 am
In fact, stakes for non-Member States are higher in Brussels I than in Rome I or II. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 6:11 pm
THE PROSECUTOR v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
The Court noted that recordings “emanating from the United States will normally not be eligible for equitable remuneration because the United States is not party to the Rome Convention. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
State. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:54 pm
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
The Tapestry Known as "The Ambassadors of Rome Offering the Throne to Numa Pomplio. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
Just because you look the same, does not mean you cannotco-exist....As the 1970 Agreement pre-dated both the Rome Convention and the Rome I Regulation, the question of breach of the 1970 Agreement fell to be decided under German law. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This can lead to uncertainty.Although Aloys Hüttermann (Michalski Hüttermann & Partner) expressed “sympathy for the concept that if one applicant is the same, then the priority claim is not lost”, he disagreed with Tobias, stating that “it is “When in Rome, do as the Romans do. [read post]
