Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
In Sharp v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:36 am
You have these dueling canons, and you have a rule that when the government sends somebody to jail for 10 years, it has to cross sharp corners. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
"In Sharp v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
Supreme Court less recalled the stately self-image of the federal bench than the sharp-elbowed, much criticized retail politics most states use to elect their judges,” and that the “third-party advertising” deployed during the process “could trigger ethical concerns or even recusals at the Supreme Court if funders bring cases there. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:37 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
The latest decision from the NJ Appellate Division involving sex offenders, State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
”]; Sharp v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
The recent Western District federal court decisions that instead state that the Restatement (Third) should be applied included Zollars v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
The problem is that Citizens United was a sharp and unjustified break with prior precedent. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:01 am
They cited a recent decision, Pettiford v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:20 pm
The Letter was in response to Sharp v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
Gore: whether the state court decision is “such a sharp departure from the state’s ordinary modes of constitutional interpretation that it lacks any fair and substantial basis in state law. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In his view it should be a matter for the Court to decide on a case by case basis but that the law need not be stated so prescriptively so as to provide that the sting of the instance which is proved must in essence be as sharp as the published, unproved libel. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:36 pm
The resulting landmark decision of Loving v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:36 pm
The resulting landmark decision of Loving v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:21 pm
United States First Circuit, 03/24/2011 Decotiis v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
The post Women behind the bar (and the bench): Ginsburg presides over re-enactment of Goesaert v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:06 am
Facts: This case (Shell Offshore Inc. v. [read post]
