Search for: "State v. Shelby"
Results 261 - 280
of 757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Recent events are additional evidence for my thesis that we are at the end of the Reagan regime and in the midst of disjunctive presidency.A central reason why Trump is getting nothing done is that the Republican coalition of the Reagan regime—which currently controls both national and most state governments—is far weaker than it appears on the surface. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
At The Franchise Project, Diana Tomezsko argues that the “events in Charlottesville recall Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s acute dissent” in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
But given the way this court has ruled in recent federalism cases (like Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
A few years ago, the Supreme Court famously embraced a principle of state equal sovereignty in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
However, the 2013 Supreme Court decision of Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Progress, however, has been interrupted.In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
That is because the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:36 pm
Herbert, United States District Judge for Utah, Judge Robert J. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
In Water Splash v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
In this decade’s redistricting, the major constitutional development, apart from Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
You will recall that a few years back in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:06 pm
At issue now, as it was when the Supreme Court decided the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:23 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Reading that transcript one finds ADLF v. [read post]
