Search for: "State v. Singh " Results 261 - 280 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
Citing Fedele v Seybert, 250 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1998], and other Appellate Division cases, Justice Singh states that since Section 1104-a’s enactment, common-law dissolution claims have been sustained only in the most egregious circumstances, in which the majority was accused of systematic looting of corporate assets in flagrant disregard of the rights of the minority shareholders. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm by Mark Walsh
The case for argument today is ;Georgia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:18 pm
This imbalance was noticed by the Supreme Court in cases like State of West Bengal v. [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area)… [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees ;and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Canada Rights body Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) has filed a defamation suit against Captain Amarinder Singh for linking the body to Pakistan’s ISI. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellant was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and claimed her immigration detention was contrary to the Hardial Singh principles and contrary to the Secretary of State’s policy in respect of detaining persons suffering with mental illness. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:55 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Its god’s way of letting you know you’ve done enough TV when you can’t raise the interest to bother watching yourself Deposit regulations AGAIN You will be pleased to hear that deposit protection regulations have already started to fall apart again  with the news reported by Nearly Legal on the case of Bali v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 (2) Section 26 states that none of the  provisions of the 2015 Amendment Act shall apply to the arbitral proceedings commenced before 23.1 [read post]