Search for: "State v. Standing Soldier" Results 261 - 280 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Holly McMahon and General Charlie Dunlap and to other members of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Standing Armies, Militias, and Individual Rights—The Constitutional Convention of 1787B. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 Lincoln came back and stated that the Union would execute a Southern soldier for each black soldier killed. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Communicated case Pritchard v. the United Kingdom A case concerning the fatal shooting of a Territorial Army soldier serving in Iraq is now pending before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney
  Two weeks later, he was arrested by U.S. soldiers, and eventually was transferred to British control in Basrah. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
(emphasis added)Long standing case law of the Court makes it clear that Article 1 is a primarily territorial limitation. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am by Fiona de Londras
(emphasis added) Long standing case law of the Court makes it clear that Article 1 is a primarily territorial limitation. [read post]