Search for: "State v. State Board of Higher Education"
Results 261 - 280
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
A fee of $100.00 shall be payable to the Alcohol Education, Rehabilitation and Enforcement Fund established pursuant to section 3 of P.L. 1983, c.531 (C. 26: 2B-32) to support the Intoxicated Driving Program Unit. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Board of Education, to overrule a past ruling that had rejected, rather than embraced, limits on state power—there is nothing that prevents the Court from undoing past rulings that impose limits on government. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:28 pm
MCRI had passed in the wake of Grutter v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:36 am
Accordingly, the court denied summary judgment to the school board on the 56-year-old teacher’s age discrimination claim (Barker v Ellington Board of Education, December 5, 2013, Hall, J). [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
See State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Instead it simply eliminated one constitutionally permissible approach to achieving the state’s legitimate goal of achieving diversity in higher education. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Richmond County Board of Education, a case that was decided only three years after Plessy. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm
Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
The case also invites the Justices to overturn the Court’s 1977 decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, which held it constitutional for a government to compel employees to pay such fees to an exclusive representative for speaking and contracting with the government over policies that affect their profession. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm
Cutting the amount down by half or even more still means a $30 million or so hit on higher education in Canada. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
Bakke, the Supreme Court ruled that achieving racial diversity in higher education is a "compelling" governmental interest. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
In previous gay rights decisions, such as United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:26 am
Coverage continues of pre-election challenges to various state voting law restrictions. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm
Maryland State Board of Elections, (No. 02-C-11-163050)). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:24 am
Thus, by applying "the qualifying term 'reasonably' or 'reasonable' in evaluating Guzman’s limitations, the board improperly imposed a higher burden on Guzman than the statute dictates. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Jefferson County Board of Education and Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
