Search for: "State v. Sutherland" Results 261 - 280 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
R v Sutherland underpins the importance of briefing those conducting the surveillance beforehand on the specific authorisation.The significance of these reports lies not so much in the specifics, but in the fact that they illustrate a more effective form of regulating surveillance. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Harlan Cohen
The personality and experience of individual justices, hinted at in portraits of Justice Sutherland or references to international roles played by Jay, Marshall, Taft, Hughes, and Jackson, recede into the background. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Brandeis, George Sutherland, and Edward Sanford. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:24 am
The supermajority requirements of Article V were daunting when one looked at the political situation state by state. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
Wiener, co-chair of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act defense practice at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. [read post]
Article IV also clearly states that such decisions are to be taken by the Ministerial Council in accordance with the specific requirements for “decision-making” in the WTO Agreement, or in any of the covered multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The issues for board consideration could include “corporate size, organic v. non-organic growth, market strength, efficiencies, economies of scale and pricing models. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
Justice Cohen summarized and applied the law as follows: [11]                        In  Sutherland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Judge Roland Sutherland held (here’s the judgment) that nothing in the legislation suggests that the list of key points should be kept secret from the public. [read post]