Search for: "State v. TM" Results 261 - 280 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Because it helped TM owners, and because the word "famous" had been used in state cases supposedly implementing 6bis. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:25 am by Kenan Farrell
(SD, filed 3/8/2021) – No update yet La Michoacana Meat Market TM Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hughes: could compare cases where they narrow the claim of the TM registration v. narrow the claim of the patent—Maker’s Mark case where they have a registration for a wax seal but claim only red. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Swagway v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Merpel has heard that the Administrative Council will discuss such a plan next week, and can’t wait to know non-EU contracting states’ reaction to the idea of the CJEU resolving their disputes. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
KG v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt the Court addresses the issue of how a service of bringing together services to allow consumers to compare and purchase them can be considered 'a service' in the meaning of the TM Directive. [read post]