Search for: "State v. TM"
Results 261 - 280
of 740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Campbell Road, Suite 312Richardson TX 75080Phone 214-383-9088Fax 214-383-5890 Email… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Stand back and be sensible, please EU TM system! [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:55 am
So there is no infringement of a registered TM, but could there be passing off? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
The company also registered the name as a trademark in all European countries as national marks, e.g. the UK (TM 508257). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Procedural: qui tam structure (addressing fraud on the public, misuse of a state grant). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Ontological v. pragmatic: the essential Q is whether TM/© protection would restrict access to a useful technology. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
For example, in TM Delmarva Power v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
For example, in TM Delmarva Power v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
See, e.g., RCI TM Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 6:25 am
In T.M.S. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 6:25 am
In T.M.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:00 am
2Die4Kourt v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:11 am
Daniel RR v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:05 am
Bobbleheads.com, LLC v. [read post]