Search for: "State v. TM" Results 261 - 280 of 740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Stand back and be sensible, please EU TM system! [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:55 am by Isaac
 So there is no infringement of a registered TM, but could there be passing off? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
The company also registered the name as a trademark in all European countries as national marks, e.g. the UK (TM 508257). [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Procedural: qui tam structure (addressing fraud on the public, misuse of a state grant). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ontological v. pragmatic: the essential Q is whether TM/© protection would restrict access to a useful technology. [read post]