Search for: "State v. Taylor E."
Results 261 - 280
of 719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
*Addressing Plaintiff's argument that her Article 78 was timely under the "continuous wrong doctrine," the Appellate Division, citing Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, indicated that the continuing wrong doctrine "may only be predicated on continuing unlawful acts and not on the continuing effects of earlier unlawful conduct. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
*Addressing Plaintiff's argument that her Article 78 was timely under the "continuous wrong doctrine," the Appellate Division, citing Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, indicated that the continuing wrong doctrine "may only be predicated on continuing unlawful acts and not on the continuing effects of earlier unlawful conduct. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:24 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003)); Learners Online, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Taylor serves as a board member of Oil States International, Inc. and Tidewater Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
" Consistent with this revised view, the County commenced an action to recover the alleged overpayment from Kenneth E. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Marie-Andrée tells how it went. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Another Taylor police officer also testified that defendant admitted that he searched GL's name on the LEIN system while they were discussing defendant's criminal case, although he stated at the time, `I'm not even sure why I did it. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
In addition to the Illinois patients, there are patients in other states, but the Illinois officials did not report what states are involved. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
" The residency requirement remains in some states as an element of a higher degree of the crime.In Taylor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Molly E. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
" PROSECUTOR V. [read post]
