Search for: "State v. Tech"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
With negotiations re-convening in just a few short days, it’s crucial that everyone lift their voices to ensure this proposed treaty doesn’t set human rights and tech law back by decades. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:52 am
Z.B. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
In contrast, the article reports, California has taken the lead on a “fiber-above-all” approach, rather than a tech-neutral approach that would allow for more fixed wireless and other fiber-alternative projects in the state. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 10:41 am
From Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi's opinion last week in M.K. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
IP rights define boundaries of exclusion, inclusion and belonging, tied to nation-state building. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:47 am
In 2017 the 10th Circuit held in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
They knew that they couldn’t state with certainty that the vaccine worked, that there weren’t side effects, etc., yet still denounced people who asked those questions. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
Most banks in the country do not service cannabis companies as marijuana remains illegal at the federal level despite several states legalizing its medicinal and recreational use. . . . [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
DXC Tech. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On 14 July 2023, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Chinese state broadcaster’s international division, China Global Television Network (CGTN), against a £125,000 fine handed down by Ofcom, Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:52 am
While the events forming the basis of the dispute in BioPoint, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
