Search for: "State v. Trader" Results 261 - 280 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm by Josh Blackman
US Affirm Details Janus Capital v. 1st Derivative Traders Reverse Details Goodyear Lux. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am by Broc Romanek
” A few weeks ago, the IMF published its FSAP review of the United States, covering banking, insurance and securities. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
For instance, do dark pools and high frequency traders improve overall liquidity? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The effect of the CJEU's decision was that claimants can potentially obtain pan-EU relief against multiple connected defendants located in different Member States, provided that there is an 'anchor' defendant sued in its Member State of domicile.The complexities of the jurisdiction issues raised in Nintendo have been further highlighted in a recent reference by the Court of Appeal to the CJEU in AMS Neve Ltd & Ors v Heritage Audio S.L. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
First Derivative Traders can be repackaged and pursued as a fraudulent-scheme claim. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:13 pm
Access, Fairness, and Accountability in the Law of Search Oren Bracha & Frank Pasquale Notes Swap Meet: Introducing the Framers to Nader's Traders Through Porter v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm
If we say you have to work for white slave traders (i.e. a pimp and a possible suspect class), you have to work for white slave traders. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Lyle Denniston
First Derivative Traders (09-525) — Securities fraud liability of investment adviser to a mutual fund for the fund’s misleading statements about trading practices. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
A necessary ingredient of a claim in malicious falsehood is that special damage must follow as a direct and natural result of the publication (see Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62, at 67). [read post]