Search for: "State v. Waterhouse" Results 261 - 280 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm by Diversity Insight
Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:35 pm by jak4
Browsing the list of subjects besides the general topic “Law” (5698 articles), users can find references assigned such subjects as: Administrative Law: 42 articles, including: Social science research on trial: use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Price Waterhouse, 84 N.Y.2d 535, 541, 644 N.E.2d 1009, 620 N.Y.S.2d 318 (1994)). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:33 am
Earlier this month, the Bombay High Court issued its judgment in the case of Price Waterhouse & Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Assuming that the legal malpractice causes of action accrued more than three years before this action was commenced (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 543; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872, 872; Alicanti v Bianco, 2 AD3d 373, 374), nevertheless, the complaint adequately alleged that the plaintiff was "left with the reasonable impression that [Levinson] was, in fact, actively addressing… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
The Supreme Court also dropped a footnote, however, stating that:"the Court has not definitively decided whether the evidentiary framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:00 am by Darren Rosenblum
  Rather than wait for society to absorb the anti-sex-stereotyping lessons of decisions such as Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:42 am
Judge Hardiman quoted language from the famous gender stereotyping case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
  Absent a connection to the employment decision, stray remarks likely do not suffice as evidence, as noted by Justice O’Connor in her concurring opinion in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]