Search for: "State v. Watkins"
Results 261 - 280
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
Watkins hired her. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
In today’s case (Weaver v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Yeakey, No. 142658, be held in abeyance pending the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions in People v Pullen (No. 142751) and People v Watkins (No. 142031), which may resolve an issue raised in the application. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Watkins Associated Industries (1993) 6 Cal.4th 644, 651-652.) [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
In Greenlaw v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
That was Justice Scalia this morning in Davis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
” Among prosecutors in Texas — and the rest of the country — Watkins is a rare breed. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:07 pm
” Watkins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:32 pm
Alabama legal sources said that attorneys for James Callahan, facing execution in that state at 6 p.m. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Henry Watkins Skinner. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:36 am
Watkins et al. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
In Watkins v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Edo, No. 06-100, and Safeco Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]