Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas" Results 261 - 280 of 2,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Baude cited Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in last term’s Gamble v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the “defiant jurisprudence” of Justice Clarence Thomas, who is completing his 29th year on the Supreme Court bench this term. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
Thomas and Sotomayor only once voted together without any other justices, in dissent from the 2016 decision in Voisine v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Brad Schnure
Sincerely, Thomas Kean Leader Steven Oroho Budget Officer Kristin Corrado Conference Leader Joe Pennacchio Whip Robert Singer Deputy Leader Chris Brown Deputy Conference Leader Kip Bateman Deputy Whip Anthony M. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Thomas, however, wanted to talk about whether the states had standing to bring the case. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie highlights the “tension between principle and practicality” in Chiafalo v. [read post]