Search for: "Stocking v. Ives"
Results 261 - 280
of 646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
These services include, but are not limited to, services relating to (i) sales, endorsement, co-branding or similar agreements, (ii) product development and marketing, (iii) credit approval and collections, (iv) customer service, (v) funding or other treasury matters, (vi) loan portfolio acquisitions, mergers or other acquisitions, (vii) financial, legal or accounting matters, or (viii) acquisition of or advice or assistance to others to… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
” To comply, the free beer: (i) must not be contingent upon the purchase of an alcoholic beverage; (ii) the permit holder must have initially purchased the beer from the distributor/manufacturer; (iii) the beer must be in stock; (iv) the manufacturer must purchase the beer from the retailer at regular price; (v) the consumer is limited to 2 free beers up to 12 ounces during a 2 hour-period; and (vi) the beer must be consumed on premises. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
IV who owns $178 million of the property's debt, have agreed on a settlement to sell the 696-room Las Vegas property at auction. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
In addition, the Micromet court was not persuaded that the following omissions from the 14D-9 disclosure statement sent to shareholders were sufficient to show a reasonable probability of success on a breach of fiduciary duty of disclosure claim: (i) the specific fees paid by Micromet to Goldman Sachs, its financial advisor, for unrelated work for the previous two years, (ii) the amount of Goldman’s ownership of the buyer’s stock, (iii) the… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:37 am
Stock a. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Roe (2006), ‘Legal Origins, Politics, and Modern Stock Markets’ PART VI COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL SYSTEM – ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES 16. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:45 am
In addition to the commission percentage other factors to be considered in determining the fairness of commission charges include: (i) the type of security involved; (ii) the availability of the security; (iii) the price of the security; (iv) the size of the transaction; (v) whether disclosure of the transaction cost was made to the customer prior to the trade’s execution; (vi) pattern of mark-ups; and (vii) the nature of the member’s business. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
These services include, but are not limited to, services relating to (i) sales, endorsement, co-branding or similar agreements, (ii) product development and marketing, (iii) credit approval and collections, (iv) customer service, (v) funding or other treasury matters, (vi) loan portfolio acquisitions, mergers or other acquisitions, (vii) financial, legal or accounting matters, or (viii) acquisition of or advice or assistance to others to… [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:11 am
Financial markets in widely traded corporate stock accord a premium to a block of stock that can assure corporate control. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
Dudley Metropolitan Council v Mailley (2023) EWCA Civ 1246 We first saw this very sad case on first appeal in the High Court – our note here. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
Clayton Act limiting partial stock acquisitions for as low as ten (10) per cent of holding of voting stock (Medtronic Inc. 63 Fed. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:22 pm
ULA defended its work as the only company currently in the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program, noting its commitment to mission success and its efforts to lower costs to the government through a block buy of Atlas V and Delta IV rocket cores. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:03 pm
Metzler Investment GMBH v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 12:55 pm
| Marcus by Goldman Sachs® [iv] Id. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:18 pm
[31] See Terry v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 4:31 am
" Garfield v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 am
Below we in turn comment on: (i) Our obtaining different results than those reported by CGSW when applying CGSW’s empirical methodology to the same data; (ii) The inconsistency of CGSW’s claims with some of their own reported results; (iii) CGSW’s puzzling “discovery” of a well-known selection effect; (iv) CGSW’s failure to engage with prior work conducting matched sample analysis and reaching opposite conclusions; (v) CGSW’s flawed… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
" [25] IV. [read post]
