Search for: "Strand v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 6:15 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 6568293 (W.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
Here’s a very brief summary of that strand: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:43 pm
Here is the abstract: On September 14, 2010, the Ninth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
But still the rumours persist: whispers around the hearthside, hushed conversations in ale-houses, and meek utterances made through the froth of lattes and macchiatos consumed on the Strand. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
It is primarily this tension which explains the conflicting strands of case law across several jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Historically 'stranded capital', in the ireprressible language of utility regulation. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
In essence its legal argument had two main strands. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
There have been 139 men in the United States freed from death row on the basis of new evidence. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm
The United States had no interest in prosecuting Noah. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am
The most obvious symbol of centralized interpretive authority is the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
United States, 312 F.2d 418, 426 (Ct. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm
Eugene Kontorovich passes along the news about United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:16 am
United States, 312 F.2d 418, 426 (Ct. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
