Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
United States, No. 11-99003 (Silverman with Wardlaw; partial dissent by Reinhardt)--- A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a § 2255 post-conviction motion filed by a federal death-row prisoner, holding that defense counsels' guilt- and penalty-phase strategies were the product of professionally reasonable investigations under Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Nevertheless, the court found no Strickland prejudice at the guilt phase. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will be controlled by Strickland v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will be controlled by Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm
Use of STV in United States Single transferable vote systems are used in municipal elections in the United States in San Francisco, California; Minneapolis, Minnesota; St. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
Donald, the underlying question is whether a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must include a showing of prejudice under the usual rule of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Consequently, as a result, the state court’s conclusion to the contrary, in denying the 440 motion, involved an “unreasonable application” of Strickland. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:47 am
Medina v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Also, the panel questioned prior circuit precedent holding that Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
“Establishing that a state court’s application of Strickland was unreasonable under § 2254(d) is all the more difficult. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
