Search for: "Strike Industries, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 1,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 1:25 pm by David Gallacher and Keeley A. McCarty
The new VA class deviation revises VAAR 808.002, Priorities for Use of Government Supply Sources, and subpart 808.6, Acquisition from Federal Prison Industries, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096 Issues: (1) Whether the “touches or strikes” language in the Florida battery statutes is divisible under Descamps v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
In 1970, the New Jersey Supreme Court abandoned the “complete invalidation” rule in Solari Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Willen: the courts have focused on strikes; that creates a clustering. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Because eminent domain cases present a conflict between the rights of property owners and the right of a sovereign government to seize property for public use, courts are required to strike a delicate balance. [read post]
Some of the issues raised by the above cases may seem relatively minor, technical, or limited to particular industries. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
HHN moved to dismiss and moved to strike the state law trade libel claim under California’s anti-SLAPP law. [read post]