Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A."
Results 261 - 280
of 662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2007, 10:06 am
Here is the abstract:The United States Supreme Court recently clarified in Lingle v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
” Also at The National Law Review, Gary Pappas looks at Thomas’ opinion for the court on Tuesday in Home Depot U.S.A. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
The Appeals Court indicates, "We need not engage in that complex issue and fact specific analysis in this case, because we have direct Supreme Court guidance. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(…) The Supreme Court has concluded that to establish standing under California’s UCL and FAL, a consumer need only allege that he or she relied on a misrepresentation when purchasing the product, and that he or she would not have purchased the product but for the representation. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 663 F.3d 1221, 1236 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:13 pm
Today the California Supreme Court answered questions that the Ninth Circuit certified to it in litigation over cigarette addiction. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
Given the Supreme Court’s track record in such cases, if the court grants review, it could be a spooky day for the government. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 245 F.Supp.2d 1102, 1107 (S.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:23 am
The upshot is that the Supreme Court should proceed with great caution in this area. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:17 am
Synthes (U.S.A.), 371 F. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:35 am
In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled against the service advisors. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
(U.S.A.), No. 09-3682, 2011 WL 285156 (7th Cir. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm
And, as the Supreme Court has unambiguously instructed, the Lanham Act always places the ‘burden of proving likelihood of confusion … on the party charging infringement. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued three opinions. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
President Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the current vacancy on the Supreme Court will encounter both procedural and substantive opposition. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Although commentators have handicapped the case differently, it is possible that the Supreme Court will overturn the deferential standard of judicial review of agency interpretations adopted in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
McDonough, 21-972Issues: (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
Applying the Supreme Court’s seminal 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Importantly, Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
It will take some time until Jarkesy is ripe for argument and even longer before the Supreme Court issues a decision. [read post]
