Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2017, 1:54 pm
When data is being declared the ‘oil of the digital era’ and millions in venture capital funding await those who can exploit it, it's time to reevaluate how to think of data breaches and misuse, and how we restore access to the courts for those impacted by them. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
On Monday I attended the oral argument before the Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
Singh literally questioned the court's role in monitoring the "forest matter" for nearly a decade. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 8:14 pm
The Kentucky case reached the high court after that state's Supreme Court upheld Kentucky's lethal injection procedures, opening the door for the justices to tackle the issue. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The Supreme Court today affirmed the 2d Circuit's decision invalidating Vermont's law forbidding the sale or use for marketing purposes only of pharmacy records that contain the prescribing practices of individual physicians. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
DauscherThe California Supreme Court's recent and eagerly awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:27 am
"I think there's a fear that the attorneys will grandstand and the courts will grandstand, or the judge will play to an audience and people won't get a fair trial, but when you look at other states that have cameras in the courtroom ... they are unobtrusive," Gull said. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:19 pm
Greg Abbott and Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht have proposed that the Texas Legislature enact bail reform. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:24 am
EFF also cited the Atlas in an amicus brief about drones filed with Michigan's state Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
The Government's collection of telephony metadata from a third party such as a telecommunications service provider is not considered a search under the Fourth Amendment, at least under the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:29 am
One of the issues we talked about is the police's use of Global Positioning System (GPS) devices to track people's movements. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:06 pm
Look for such a case in the 2021-2022 term; we'll be monitoring the High Court's docket so we can report back to our readers.We Can HelpIf you own or operate a business that has been enjoined from serving your customers and your business is arguably "essential", our law firm can provide assistance. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:03 pm
The appeals court's conclusion on the incompetent representation point was quite damning. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
The ACLU/EFF amicus brief says - and CDT agrees - that the Supreme Court's landmark decision in the 2012 GPS tracking case, U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
That's easy. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:39 pm
With the many changes to the healthcare industry coming up under Obamacare, it is vital that nursing homes be monitored to ensure they are providing the health and wellbeing of their residents and upholding the Patient's Bill of Rights. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:14 am
We have never equated police efficiency with unconstitutionality and decline to do so now.'" (Quoting Knotts, a central Supreme Court case that the Maynard court interprets very differently.) [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:07 am
"AG pitch on revenge porn a PR moveMark Bennett has written how some folks simply can't believe the US Supreme Court meant what it's said in rulings about protected speech, and apparently Attorney General Ken Paxton is one of them. [read post]
C-SPAN chairman Brian Lamb asks Chief Justice John Roberts to televise the Obamacare oral arguments.
16 Nov 2011, 7:27 am
Perhaps it's that more people will pay attention if there is video, but how dare he hold his position of power and argue that his work should be monitored by fewer people? [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm
We remand to consider whether the policy provides the kind of objective, workable standard required by the Supreme Court's recent Mansky decision. [read post]
