Search for: "T. J. T." Results 261 - 280 of 37,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2009, 3:06 am
It's IntLawGrrls' great pleasure to welcome Rachel J. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:43 am
Stuart Rose, the British clothier’s chief executive, created a buzz Wednesday when he said a combination with supermarket chain J Sainsbury is an "interesting" idea and that "your shareholders would think you were an idiot if you didn't consider it. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:20 am
"Roommate-finder doesn't facilitate discrimination, court rules; The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals finds Roommates.com and services like it aren't obligated to force unwanted roommates on their clients; 'There's no place like home,' the court says": Carol J. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:59 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Une première condition idéale, dans laquelle les termes "seulement" et "uniquement" peuvent revêtir leur signification plutôt exclusive, s'applique dans le cadre de l'invention définie par la revendication avec un certain niveau d'abstraction, et donc de théorie. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The facts must also plausibly explain that the events stated were the cause of the failure to observe the time limit (T 13/82). [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:34 am by Diane Tweedlie
W 11/89, OJ 1993, 225, point 4.1; W 6/97, point 6.3; T 173/06, point 8; T 1888/09, point 2.1). [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:22 pm by Howard Bashman
“The left couldn’t prevent Kavanaugh’s confirmation — Here’s their latest Supreme Court strategy”: Peter J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:56 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The post ‘I didn’t do anything wrong’: Man arrested after paying homeless woman to care for his granddaughter appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Via Andrew Sullivan, couples and families urge the California Supreme Court to preserve same-sex marriage in the Golden State:"Fidelity": Don't Divorce... from Courage Campaign on Vimeo.- Garry J. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 666/90, T 552/97 and T 1439/05), the fact that the final requests were not established contravenes the provisions of Article 113(2) EPC and is considered a substantial procedural violation. [3] The substantial procedural violation requires that the decision under appeal be set aside and justifies the reimbursement of the appeal fee according to R 67 EPC 1973 (applicable here, see J 10/07 [7]). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This is so even if the subject-matter of the two applications is highly similar (see J 27/94 [3]). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:11 am
According to the judge, "[t]his is especially the case where [the Secretary of State] has a number of options to choose from. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 Claim 1 of the main request was identical with claim 1 as granted:Paint and coating material system comprisinga) at least one solid component comprising at least one organic or inorganic white, black or chromatic pigment, organic or inorganic fillers, or mixtures thereof, andb) at least one binder component;characterised in that the components of the system in water, with an energy input of less than 150 J/cm3, based on the sum of the volumes of the components and water, result in an… [read post]