Search for: "THE FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION" Results 261 - 280 of 496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Liberty Street Economics – New York Fed – First in a two-part series, Gara Afonso and João Santos: “Did the Dodd-Frank Act end ‘‘too-big-to-fail’’ (TBTF)? [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm by Joy Waltemath
First, it allows individuals to claim exemptions from neutral government mandates even in cases in which the government is not involved. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gene patents first granted in early 1980s. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Ricky Stewart                 California: Liberty Mutual and Farmers Insurance vs. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
  First up is the immigration case Kerry v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
City of Sanibel 14-404Issue: (1) Whether traditional property rights are among those fundamental rights and liberties subject to the substantive protections of due process, per Lingle v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Westport Insurance Corporation, 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Westport Insurance Corporation, 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:47 pm by Larry
First, I freely admit that I have not read the cited case. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
PF Chang's CGL Insurer Seeks Declaratory Judgement on Data Breach Claim http://t.co/tKIw2toZ7j -> RIAA updates list of rogue piracy sites http://t.co/bNIaogssZU -> Mega-pirate Torrent Site Uses Google To Resurrect Taken Down Content http://t.co/U2pMXvqW0n – -> The CopyKat ….. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:02 am by Amy Howe
First, a bit of background. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
More recently, the Supreme Court held that regulations promulgated pursuant to the Affordable Care Act that required for-profit closely held corporations to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Paul M. Secunda
I am not a RFRA scholar, and only have my own personal views about whether corporations should have religious liberty rights under that law. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
On the first question, Justice Alito reasons quite broadly, and rests statutory protection for Hobby Lobby on the ground that a for-profit closely held corporation is itself a “person” capable of the “exercise of religion” under RFRA (rather than resting protection on the idea that the persons whom RFRA protects are the owners of a corporation, and the fact that Hobby Lobby’s owners are operating through the corporate form should not… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
First, they can and should hold that a RFRA does not and should not grant rights to for-profit nonreligious corporations. [read post]