Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA" Results 261 - 280 of 35,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 10:14 am
Rumors are circulating among legal blogs that a ruling with be issued tomorrow by the California Supreme Court regarding the legality of Prop. 8. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:21 am by tortsprof
The California Supreme Court is reviewing a case by one of the courts of appeal that adopted "innovator liability" in products cases, the doctrine imposing liability on brand name manufacturers for injuries caused by their generic versions. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:14 am
Rumors are circulating among legal blogs that a ruling with be issued tomorrow by the California Supreme Court regarding the legality of Prop. 8. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:36 am by Eric Tausend
(previously discussed here) the Supreme Court of California heard oral arguments in the case yesterday morning. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
. , a unanimous decision by the California Supreme Court resolves a split between California courts of appeal by ruling that a trial court does not have inherent authority to strike PAGA claims on manageability grounds—even if those claims are complex or time-intensive. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:21 pm by Maureen Cosgrove
Last year, the California Supreme Court [official website] held [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that the state's policy did not conflict with federal law because a student's high school... [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:39 am by William Hibbitts
The post Supreme Court strikes down California crisis pregnancy center regulations appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Richard J. Simmons
For companies doing business in California, it’s important to be aware of the January 18, 2024 California Supreme Court decision in Estrada v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:05 am by Amy Wright
The Sacramento Bee is reporting that the  California Supreme Court has asked both parties in the case to submit briefs on the subject by next week. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:16 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Spring Almost four years ago, the California Supreme Court granted review of Harris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:39 am
In a landmark ruling, the California Supreme Court has ruled that a woman can sue a manufacturer of name-brand drugs for the alleged damages caused by a generic version of that drug. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:26 pm
On Wednesday, January 15, 2020, the California Supreme Court agreed to review a second case raising questions as to the scope and retroactivity of its landmark 2018 Dynamex decision. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
In deciding that the California survival statute did not apply to foreign corporations, the Supreme Court resolved a split among California appellate courts on the interpretation of California Corporations Code Section 2010 (“Section 2010”), which governs the winding-up and survival of dissolved corporations. [read post]
For nearly 30 years prior to this decision, California courts had used a multi-factor analysis, first described by the California Supreme Court in S. [read post]