Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges"
Results 261 - 280
of 490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Special Counsel Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump’s Immunity Claim MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 4/8/2024 Special counsel Jack Smith urged the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court declined to intervene in the case. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
Since the Delaware Supreme Court issued its ATP Tour opinion, the question of whether or not corporate boards should be able to unilaterally adopt fee-shifting bylaws has been actively debated. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
That includes two female Supreme Court justices, one of whom is the high court’s only Hispanic justice. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:10 pm
Brandenbug, as I mentioned in my earlier post, is the United States Supreme Court case that articulates the relevant standard: speech may only be banned on the theory that it is incitement when it is intended to create, and likely to create, a clear and present danger of imminent lawless action. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Pape, that the Supreme Court held that the federal statute codified as 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court now sees itself correcting an erroneous and artificial barrier between church and state, despite the federalism proclivities of most of the conservative members of the current Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am
But Western District of Oklahoma Judge Jodi Dishman isn’t buying. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm
Currently, non-compete contracts are regulated by state law: three states (California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, as well as the District of Columbia) outright ban their enforcement, aside from a few narrow exceptions. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
These propositions have been recognized by courts at every level, from the United States Supreme Court on down. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:00 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
” Judges have blocked similar laws in other states, including Alabama and Oklahoma. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:13 am
District Court Judge Gregory Frost, who is considering a lawsuit filed by several inmates challenging the state's lethal-injection procedures. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
In particular, in Burson, the Supreme Court recognized two separate compelling interests that support restrictions on electioneering near polling places: first, “a State has a compelling interest in protecting voters from confusion and undue influence”; and second, “a State indisputably has a compelling interest in preserving the integrity of its election process. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:28 pm
Thomas then notes that this is the first time a jury in Oklahoma has ever sentenced a juvenile to life in prison for a non murder case: I cannot agree with the Court that Oklahoma citizens should be constitutionally disabled from using this sentencing practice merely because they have not done so more frequently. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
Judge Kozinski had this to say about “prosecutors fair play”: “The Supreme Court has told us in no uncertain terms that a prosecutor’s duty is to do justice, not merely obtain a conviction. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court held that as long as reasonable, non-discriminatory alternatives exist that serve the states legitimate interests, they must be used instead of a discriminatory ban.In Hughes v Oklahoma (1979), the Court invalidated an Oklahoma law prohibiting the interstate transportation of minnows taken from Oklahoma waters. [read post]
