Search for: "Tallman v. Tallman"
Results 261 - 280
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:33 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:08 am
Judge Tallman set out the legal test for this, which looks at "…whether the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is [now] the product [and not] the producer".Judge Tallman continued that the claim for the genericness of a product or service always has to relate to a particular type of goods or services the mark is registered for. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 11:51 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:26 am
Recall that Democratic appointees are more numerous on the 9th Circuit than Republican appointees: the split is 16-11 (or 15-12 if you count Judge Tallman, a Republican appointed by Clinton as part of the Washington deal, where he's most accurately counted). [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:27 pm
And when even I -- no shrinking violet, let me assure you -- might well have been a fair piece nicer to the other side, that's a telling sign.(4) Finally, unmentioned in either opinion is the fact that the lower court's decision here was issued by none other than Judge Tallman, who was sitting by designation in Idaho. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Leading, needless to say, to an arrest (for being a felon in possession), which in turn leads to a motion to suppress.The panel consists of Judges Beezer, Tallman and Milan Smith. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
There are four Republican appointees in the majority, counting Judge Tallman as a Republican appointee, which he is in all but name, plus Judge Rawlinson. [read post]
14 May 2008, 10:48 am
As well as Judge Tallman, who's a Clinton appointee but who's joinder on this one is hardly surprising.But what's equally interesting is who's missing. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
The case was argued on September 9, 2010, and it drew a good panel for the defendant: Betty Fletcher, Tallman, and Rawlinson. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Gould and Tallman lean right in criminal cases, so -- from my "academic" court-watching chair, I'll put them down as no votes. [read post]
