Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 261 - 280 of 21,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm by Rachel Bloom, ACLU
The truth is that not a single one of our six plaintiffs operates heavy machinery as part of their academic training. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:20 am by emagraken
Their observations are of assistance to the trier of fact to the degree to which they reasonably conform to the facts that have been established after the plaintiff’s assertions have been tested. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:20 am by emagraken
Their observations are of assistance to the trier of fact to the degree to which they reasonably conform to the facts that have been established after the plaintiff’s assertions have been tested. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:43 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Thus, in fact, defendants often allow the plaintiff’s anchor to go unrebutted, but this strategy has also not been rigorously tested. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:18 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that defendant's auto body part design patents were invalid and rejected plaintiff's argument that the aesthetic-functionality test should apply to design patents. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 2:55 pm by Erin Napoleon
Indeed, the documentary evidence shows that the defendants have avoided widespread testing of staff and detainees of the facility, not for lack of tests, but for feat that positive test results would require them to implement safety measures that they apparently felt were not worth the trouble. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In addition, the plaintiff class consisted of parents or legal guardians who incurred expenses, allegations of liabilities in testing their children. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:32 pm by Nassiri Law
According to the Gibbs case court records, plaintiff applied for a police officer position, sailing through the written test and receiving a conditional job offer. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:35 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  Causation-in-fact is determined using either the “but for” test (when a single negligent act is at issue), or the substantial factor test (when two or more independent negligent acts may have contributed to the injury). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The court explained that the plaintiffs presented considerable expert testimony showing that, had the manufacturer conducted testing on the vehicle’s seatbelt mechanism, it was likely that a safer design would have been used after the results of the test were interpreted. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm by emagraken
  Here too they relied for their respective opinions to a significant degree on what they were told by the plaintiff without the benefit, as the court had, of a thorough and lengthy cross-examination of the plaintiff during which her self-reports and evidence generally were tested. [192]     In contrast to the plaintiff, Sean gave his evidence in a down-to-earth and forthright fashion. [read post]
In applying the test, the Ninth Circuit found that plaintiffs, a group of cosmetology students, “were the primary beneficiaries of their labors,” because their internship at defendant’s beauty school “provided them with the hands-on training they needed to sit for the state licensing exams. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
Plaintiff’s orthopedist reported, inter alia, that the range of motion examination is a subjective test under the voluntary control of the individual being tested, thus raising credibility issues which are to be determined by the trier of fact. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Jury Sides With Plaintiff in Snow Slip-and-Fall Case, August 25, 2016, The Legal Intelligencer More Blog Entries: Eye Test as Means to Test for Concussion and Brain Injury, July 23, 2016, Boston Brain Injury Lawyer Blog The post Report: Jury Finds for Plaintiff in Snow Slip-and-Fall Case appeared first on Boston Personal Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Zoe Tillman
District Judge Rosemary Collyer, was in charge of calibrating and testing the breath test machines, known as Intoxilyzers. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
In all copyright infringement cases, a plaintiff must prove, among other things, that the defendant copied elements of plaintiff’s work that are protected by copyright. [read post]
16 Dec 2004, 3:34 pm
[JURIST] Florida Chief District Judge Robert Hinkle ruled Wednesday that a policy subjecting all Florida Department of Juvenile Justice employees to random drug testing was unconstitutionally applied to an office worker, accepting the plaintiff's argument that testing should be reserved for employees who either create a suspicion that they are drug users or work in positions involving law [read post]