Search for: "The National Plaintiffs Group" Results 261 - 280 of 7,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 3:35 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
“We simply hold that, in prohibiting the particular forms of support that plaintiffs seek to provide to foreign terrorist groups, § 2339B does not violate the freedom of speech. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm by Jim Mann
A record setting number of attendees for the National Restaurant Association’s Quality Assurance Study Group’s annual session filled the Millennium Conference Room at Loews Philadelphia Hotel this past week for a three-day introspection of the industry’s food safety policies and practices. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The author of this is article is John Stone, a legal research attorney with National Legal Research Group in Charlottesville, VA. [read post]
In al-Bihani, Kavanaugh concurred in the denial of a rehearing for an earlier panel opinion he had joined, which held that the 2001 AUMF authorizes the detention of members of al-Qaeda, the Taliban and associated forces as well as those who “substantially support” those groups. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:32 am by Preston Lim
Government Implements Key Provisions of the National Security Act, 2017 The National Security Act, 2017, better known as Bill C-59, received royal assent on June 21, 2019. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In the case, a group of environmental nonprofits challenged the Forest Service's "salvage logging" rules (rules that greased the skids, so to speak, for timber sales following fires throughout the National Forest System). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Harold Hongju Koh
In both cases, the government invoked a grossly overbroad group stereotype that presumed that membership in that group, standing alone, signaled a potential hidden desire of every group member to harm the United States. [read post]
22 May 2008, 9:23 am by Legal Talk Network
On May 15, 2008, in a 4-3 decision, California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs-comprised of gay rights group Equality California, almost two dozen gay couples and the city of San Francisco, who argued that the 2000 law banning same-sex marriage in the state was discriminatory. [read post]
22 May 2008, 9:23 am
On May 15, 2008, in a 4-3 decision, California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs-comprised of gay rights group Equality California, almost two dozen gay couples and the city of San Francisco, who argued that the 2000 law banning same-sex marriage in the state was discriminatory. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Booker is a member of the Nation of Islam, requiring that he practice certain rituals during Ramadan. [read post]