Search for: "The People v. Watson" Results 261 - 280 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
The government points to a long history of restricting gun ownership by people who pose a threat to others. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: Watson—a computer that can analyze language and come up with answers—how does the deployment of tech like this change the issues? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:57 am by Adam Wagner
People enjoy observing a lively debate, and Twitter demonstrates the extent to which they are also enthusiastic to contribute. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am by Legal Beagle
He is understood to have been heading for Union Street to tell people about Hollie’s case and his plans to contest the Aberdeen South parliamentary seat as an independent candidate. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Devlin Hartline
Universal where Justice Stevens writing for the majority refers to the “copyright privilege,” and Watson v. [read post]