Search for: "Thomas Jackson" Results 261 - 280 of 2,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] Download Edited Version Of SFFA v. Harvard From Barnett/Blackman Supplement
30 Jun 2023, 12:01 am by Josh Blackman
I know that Justice Jackson's dissent will win plaudits from progressives, but there is very little actual law in it. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Clarence Thomas Reading His Epic Takedown Of KBJ’s Affirmative Action Dissent Left Her “Visibly Angry”
29 Jun 2023, 5:30 pm by William A. Jacobson
"JUSTICE JACKSON’s race-infused world view falls flat at each step.... [read post]
Legal Insurrection - https://legalinsurrection.com
“Supreme Court’s Two Black Justices Spar Over Affirmative Action”
29 Jun 2023, 2:28 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Clarence Thomas, Ketanji Brown Jackson air sharp disagreement on race in America; Thomas accused Jackson of promoting a ‘race-infused world view’; Jackson said Thomas was ignoring the facts. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court's Ruling in the Harvard and UNC Racial Preferences Cases
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm by Ilya Somin
However, only Thomas was willing to join Gorsuch's concurring opinion on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action programs in college admissions
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined the Roberts opinion. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Access today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases
29 Jun 2023, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Early Edition: June 29, 2023
29 Jun 2023, 1:27 am by Seán Binder
Chris Jackson and Annaleise Azevedo Lohr report for Ipsos. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
The U.S. Supreme Court Creates a Problem it Sought to Solve
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
Barrett and Thomas dissented. [read post]
Pennsylvania Family Law - http://pafamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
Justice Alito joined Justice Gorsuch’s plurality (with Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, and Jackson) to hold that the question was controlled by a pre-International Shoe decision, Pennsylvania Fire Ins. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Decides: "True Threats" Exception Requires Showing that Speaker Was "Reckless," i.e.,
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Barrett, joined by Justice Thomas, would have opted for what is basically a negligence standard (again, oversimplifying slightly). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Court upholds state corporate registration law in major personal jurisdiction case
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for a five-justice majority that included Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Thomas, J. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Justices throw out Colorado man’s stalking conviction in First Amendment dispute
27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am by Amy Howe
Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court, with an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Supreme Court rules against North Carolina Republicans over election law theory
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
Thomas would not have reached the “independent state legislature theory” question at all. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Access today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases
27 Jun 2023, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Supreme Court narrowly interprets ban on “encouraging or inducing” immigrants to remain unlawfully in the United States
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm by Amanda Shanor
In a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas urged his colleagues to reconsider the overbreadth doctrine in a future case. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Justices take up cases on veterans’ education benefits and 16th Amendment
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed; she would instead have dismissed the case as improvidently granted. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Latest Chapter in State Lawsuits Versus the Federal Government: United States v. Texas
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurrence in the judgment for himself and Justices Thomas and Barrett. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/