Search for: "Town School District v. Town School District" Results 261 - 280 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
For example, in Porto v Town of Harrison, 100 AD2d 870, the Appellate Division said that an individual on an eligible list does not have a "presumptive right" to appointment. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
" The Hammondsport Central School District had assigned Taylor to perform non-teaching duties after he was found guilty of certain disciplinary charges filed against him pursuant to [former] Section 3020-a of the Education Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the ADC noted in the decision issued following Petitioner's disciplinary hearing, Petitioner's untruths:[1] had an adverse impact on the supervisor, who had to defend himself against the false claim; and[2] required the Department and IAB to spend significant time investigating Petitioner's false complaint.The Appellate Division said that in Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Court of Appeals, quoting from Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the ADC noted in the decision issued following Petitioner's disciplinary hearing, Petitioner's untruths:[1] had an adverse impact on the supervisor, who had to defend himself against the false claim; and[2] required the Department and IAB to spend significant time investigating Petitioner's false complaint.The Appellate Division said that in Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Court of Appeals, quoting from Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Morgan Hill Unified School District); A commercial speech tour-guide licensing case (Kagan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]