Search for: "Two Right-of-Way Easements" Results 261 - 280 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The conditions for the Lucas test were not met because the land retained substantial residual value in its agricultural use classification which still allowed the plaintiff to use the land in economically beneficial ways. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am by Noah Sachs
There is no formal easement agreement between the two agencies that grants the Park Service a property right in the George Washington National Forest. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Kevin
Does an easement that allows you to use a driveway include the right to keep it unlocked-gate-free? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Six justices concluded that in the right circumstances, a decision by a state supreme court would violate the takings or due process clauses, while the remaining two justices concluded that some future case might be the right vehicle to decide whether a court decision could take property. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:06 am by Matthew Parham
  Here the plaintiffs sued the defendants alleging that defendants breached a 2000 agreement granting a parking easement, by modifying its lot in a way that prevented their parking. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
  But the actual answer appears to be quite the opposite, at least judging by two cases decided days apart in late June. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Central to the challenged EIR analyses were two categories of water:  (1) municipal and industrial (M&I) water, which is essentially fresh, potable water used for those purposes; and (2) “produced water,” which is groundwater found in oil and gas reservoirs and brought to the surface with the extracted resources, which usually is saline, poor quality, and unusable for agricultural, residential, commercial or industrial usage without substantial decontaminating… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Lior Strahilevitz
I believe the answer to the question of whether an adjustment of property rights as between two private parties can be a judicial taking has to be no. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
  It shows two parcel numbers, 02, and 04, corresponding to APN 0169-391-02 and APN 0169-391-04. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm by Don Cruse
ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS), L.P., No. 13-0234 : “In this case by landowners seeking property damages for violation of a pipeline right-of-way easement agreement, the principal issues are (1) whether the cost to restore the property is the proper damages measure in this contract-breach case and (2) whether the appeals court erred by holding that the landowners waived their claims by failing to submit a jury question on the nature of the property injury. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm by Glen C. Hansen
In BIA, the City of Oakland enacted an ordinance that required a developer of a multifamily project with over twenty units to either (i) spend 0.5 percent of building development costs on art displays on the site of the development or a nearby right-of-way; or (ii) pay an equivalent amount to a city-operated fund for public art installations. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:16 am by Amichai Cohen, Yuval Shany
On Feb. 20, preliminary votes on two aspects of the package (judicial appointments and denying the Supreme Court’s power to review basic laws) were held in the Knesset plenary. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm by Monica Williamson
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Right of Way Specialist, Cloquet, MN. [read post]