Search for: "Two Right-of-Way Easements" Results 261 - 280 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 11:43 am
Direct current is a good way to move that across the country, but we've got to be concerned with the rights of our landowners and their ability to continue to farm and make sure that they have the best information and representation as this project goes forward." [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm by Don Cruse
ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS), L.P., No. 13-0234 : “In this case by landowners seeking property damages for violation of a pipeline right-of-way easement agreement, the principal issues are (1) whether the cost to restore the property is the proper damages measure in this contract-breach case and (2) whether the appeals court erred by holding that the landowners waived their claims by failing to submit a jury question on the nature of the property injury. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:15 am
The servient owner may not use his property in a way that unreasonably impedes the dominant tenant in his rights. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court rejected the claim, interpreting rights-of-way as an easement — a temporary right to use the lands. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
But in the end, the most interesting aspect of the case is the way in which law is understood as open textured enough to permit private governance through contract. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether the government retains an interest in a right of way granted from public lands to railroads, which then abandoned the easement. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The state passed on that easement to Santa Barbara County, and it still possesses that right. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:29 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  The Wyoming-Colorado Railroad Company (WCRC) owned approximately 66 miles of right-of-way and two-hundred feet wide stretching from Laramie, Wyoming into Colorado. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:24 am by stacy
  The Wyoming-Colorado Railroad Company (WCRC) owned approximately 66 miles of right-of-way and two-hundred feet wide stretching from Laramie, Wyoming into Colorado. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:24 am by stacy
  The Wyoming-Colorado Railroad Company (WCRC) owned approximately 66 miles of right-of-way and two-hundred feet wide stretching from Laramie, Wyoming into Colorado. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:24 am by Cale
  The Wyoming-Colorado Railroad Company (WCRC) owned approximately 66 miles of right-of-way and two-hundred feet wide stretching from Laramie, Wyoming into Colorado. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:24 am by stacy
  The Wyoming-Colorado Railroad Company (WCRC) owned approximately 66 miles of right-of-way and two-hundred feet wide stretching from Laramie, Wyoming into Colorado. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:48 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Under the Texas Natural Resources Code §111.109(b), a common carrier has the ability to enter on and condemn land, rights-of-way, easements, and property “of any person or corporation necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of the common carrier pipeline. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Under the Texas Natural Resources Code §111.109(b), a common carrier has the ability to enter on and condemn land, rights-of-way, easements, and property “of any person or corporation necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of the common carrier pipeline. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Under the Texas Natural Resources Code §111.109(b), a common carrier has the ability to enter on and condemn land, rights-of-way, easements, and property “of any person or corporation necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of the common carrier pipeline. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Under the Texas Natural Resources Code §111.109(b), a common carrier has the ability to enter on and condemn land, rights-of-way, easements, and property “of any person or corporation necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of the common carrier pipeline. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Under the Texas Natural Resources Code §111.109(b), a common carrier has the ability to enter on and condemn land, rights-of-way, easements, and property “of any person or corporation necessary for the construction, maintenance or operation of the common carrier pipeline. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 11:14 am by Administrator
In order to properly integrate these differently owned components, a reciprocal easement agreement was registered as a charge against title to each, which set out their rights and obligations with respect to the one another in relation to access, egress and cost sharing for common assets and expenses. [read post]