Search for: "U. S. v. Ames" Results 261 - 280 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am., Inc. v Pavloff  2021 NY Slip Op 31062(U) April 2, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156855/2019 Judge: Shawn T. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
Showdown in the Spratlys Tensions between China and the Philippines increased significantly in the past few weeks, as Chinese maritime militia vessels began massing at Whitsun Reef (Chinese: Niu’e Jiao; Vietnamese: Đá Ba Đầu; Philippines: Julian Felipe Reef) in the Spratly Islands (Malay: Kepulauan Spratly; Chinese: Nánshā Qúndǎo; Philippines: Kapuluan ng Kalayaan; Vietnamese: Quần đảo Trường Sa), well within… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
Se trata de una disposición que sólo puede concebirse en un país como Cuba, en el cual (sobre todo en tiempos del “Máximo Líder”) no existen mecanismos para que una decisión adoptada por el mandamás de turno (¡como esta de nombrar del mismo modo dos unidades monetarias diferentes!) [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In a recent decision from Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2021 NY Slip Op 30561(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Feb. 19, 2021], the Court considered both of these concepts, authoring a scholarly opinion on New York’s legal rules for when an alleged oral partnership can survive the alleged partners’ subsequent decision to operate the business in a different entity form. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
De plus, c’est la demanderesse qui a subi les dommages allégués, ayant engagé seule d’importantes dépenses pour concevoir et améliorer le logiciel au fil des années. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:55 am by Christopher G. Hill
  A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]