Search for: "U. S. v. Greene" Results 261 - 280 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Enabling urban sprawl: revisiting the Supreme Court’s seminal zoning decision Euclis v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O)   US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Circuit’s opinion in Latif v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
”  In other words, a green light to pretextual traffic stops. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:30 am by Isaul Verdin, Immigration Lawyer
  Individuals must be in one of the following categories at the time of their enlistment:·         Non-Immigrant Visas:  E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U OR V  ·         Asylee, refugee, or Temporary Protected Status (TPS) 2. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:35 am
"The continuous representation doctrine . . . recognizes that a person seeking professional assistance has a right to repose confidence in the professional's ability and good faith, and realistically cannot be expected to question and assess the techniques employed or the manner in which the services are rendered'" (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167 [2001], quoting Greene v Greene, 56 NY2d 86, 94 [1982]). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Greenes Energy Group, LLC, 16-712. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1986, the Supreme Court gave the green light to the approach set out by the EEOC, holding, in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:17 pm
I am on the lookout for other remedies such as family based immigration, work based immigration, U visas for victims of crimes, T visas for victims of trafficking, Violence Against Women Act remedies, asylum, special immigrant juveniles and more, derivative eligibility for green cards, perhaps automatic or acquired citizenship or naturalization or military benefits, plus grounds of inadmissibility and removal. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Today’s second argument is in Opati v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd (IPKat) Ex-MTV executive a suspect in promo and piracy case (TorrentFreak) UK IP Office - new database of fast-tracked green inventions, designed to help the development of environmentally-friendly technology, launched (IPKat) (IPKat) Reader’s queries: UK's somewhat complex and convoluted unregistered design legislation (Class 99) Nice reference as CIPA plans to entertain (IPKat)   United States US Patent… [read post]