Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

Misappropriation

1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am by Joseph Fishkin

U. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

“Imagine” the Improbable: John Lennon, the Supreme Court, and the Resurrection of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases

30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli

S. 898, 922–923 (1997) (Brady Act provisions held unconstitutional because, among other things, they transferred power to execute federal law to state officials); United States v. [read post]

Nation of Immigrators - http://www.nationofimmigrators.com

[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Holds That Speech Creators (e.g., Web Designers) Can't Be Required to Create Content They Object to,

30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh

The logic of today's 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

State v. Newborn: Failure to Separately Indict Felon-in-Possession Did Not Deprive Court of Jurisdiction

29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm by Shea Denning

Thus, the Court has held that the failure to allege that a church is an entity capable of owning property did not render a larceny indictment fatally defective, see State v. [read post]

North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/

Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.

29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press

Held: Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions programs violate the Equal Pro- tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.

29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press

Held: Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions programs violate the Equal Pro- tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Unanimously Broadens (Somewhat) Employees' Rights to Religious Exemptions from Neutral Work Rules

29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Eugene Volokh

From Justice Alito's opinion in today's Groff v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

Iran challenges Canada’s jurisdiction in alleged terrorism civil cases at ICJ

29 Jun 2023, 6:51 am by Yuxin Nie | Wuhan U. School of Law, CN

The court previously ruled on both issues in Germany v. [read post]

JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/

Supreme Court requires that arbitrability appeals trigger automatic stay in the district court

28 Jun 2023, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog

” That's the rule in Griggs v. [read post]

Wait A Second! - http://secondcircuitcivilrights.blogspot.com/

Pocket Mortgages and Legal Malpractice

28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone

Real Estate and conflicts of interest are transactional situations rife with claims of legal malpractice, and Fields v Baker & Hostetler LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 50610(U) Decided on June 23, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. is no exception. [read post]

New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/

U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision

28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle

While the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed with that interpretation of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, it held that the statute violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in light of the Supreme Court’s caselaw since International Shoe Co. v. [read post]

Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net

Shot through the heart: Did SCOTUS give strikes a bad name?

27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm by Sarah Squillante

An 8-1 decision, Glacier Northwest v. [read post]

Employer Law Report - http://www.employerlawreport.com/

By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of the Supreme Court. Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct. 21-857, __U.S.. __ (June 22, 2023).

27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields

Jones v. [read post]

Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/

The Supreme Court issues its "true threats" case.

27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am

S. 323, 334, 348 (1974)); see also Bose Corp. v. [read post]