Search for: "U. S. v. Marks" Results 261 - 280 of 1,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am by Tian Lu
Examples of such misfortune include the ‘Aspirin’ for acetylsalicylic acid in the United States (Bayer Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm by Josh Blackman
S. 520, 547 (1993) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted);see also Holt, 574 U. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
Today they account for over a fifth of the world's largest enterprises as opposed to ten years ago where only one or two SOEs could be found at the top of the league table. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:34 pm by Josh Blackman
S. 26, 41 (1976); brackets, ellipsis, and internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
 "`[U]nder [these] circumstances, the ambiguity must be resolved against the insurer which drafted the contract'" (id.; see Cragg v Allstate Indem. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
 "`[U]nder [these] circumstances, the ambiguity must be resolved against the insurer which drafted the contract'" (id.; see Cragg v Allstate Indem. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:21 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court's decision marks an important and overdue course correction, and I join the Court's excellent opinion in full. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 10:37 pm by Josh Blackman
S., at 546 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The Court also found that the signs are conceptually different, since a stylized letter ‘h’, or two interlaced letters ‘u’, could be perceived in Huawei’s mark, whilst the stylized letters of the initials of Chanel’s founder (Coco Chanel) can be discerned in Chanel’s mark.Thus, the General Court held that the marks at issue are different. [read post]